Prompt Engineering Lab

Compare responses from different AI models with adjustable parameters

Connecting to Venice AI...
Compare various models and parameter settings to see how they affect the AI's responses. Choose different models and adjust sliders to learn through experimentation.

The Art & Science of Prompt Engineering

Discover how small changes in your prompts can dramatically improve AI responses.

Core Techniques

  • Zero-shot prompting — Direct the AI without examples
  • Few-shot learning — Provide examples of desired responses
  • Chain-of-Thought — Guide models through reasoning steps
  • Role prompting — Assign an expert role to the AI

Advanced Strategies

  • Meta-prompts — Prompts that help the AI understand how to interpret your requests
  • Context refinement — Iteratively improve prompts based on AI feedback
  • ReAct prompting — Reasoning and acting to solve complex problems
  • Tree of Thoughts — Exploring multiple reasoning paths

Latest Trends

  • Multimodal prompting — Working with text, images, and other formats
  • Constitutional AI — Using prompts to guide AI within ethical boundaries
  • Auto-prompting — AI systems that optimize their own prompts
  • Instruction tuning — Fine-tuning models to follow specific instructions

Prompt Comparison Lab

Compare two different prompting approaches side-by-side to see how they affect AI outputs.

Enter your prompt here:
function_writing_default_default
0.7
1000
0.95
function_writing_default_default
0.7
1000
0.95

Parameter Guide

Temperature

Controls randomness and creativity in responses:

  • Low (0.1-0.4): More deterministic, consistent, and focused responses
  • Medium (0.5-0.8): Balanced creativity and coherence
  • High (0.9-2.0): More creative, diverse, and unexpected outputs

Max Tokens

Sets the maximum length of AI responses:

  • Low (100-500): Brief, concise responses
  • Medium (1000-2000): Detailed explanations
  • High (3000+): Comprehensive, in-depth responses

Top P (Nucleus Sampling)

Controls diversity by limiting token selection:

  • Low (0.1-0.5): Limited vocabulary and more predictable responses
  • Medium (0.6-0.9): Balanced vocabulary selection
  • High (0.95-1.0): Wider vocabulary range for more diverse outputs